Free Case Evaluation 800-683-5291

Archive for March, 2018

Elements of a Personal Injury Claim

Posted on: March 31st, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Personal injury law is primarily based on tort law.  A tort is a civil wrong.  Criminal matters are handled by prosecutors that enforce the law.  While personal injury is also governed by law, when someone injures you, it is not entirely accurate to say they have ‘broken the law.’  That is a term that is often used to describe criminal behavior.  Personal injury law, or tort law, is more accurately described as holding people accountable when their behavior falls below the standard of care prescribed by the common law.  Unfortunately, the person responsible for causing your accident may not be willing to acknowledge their fault or pay for your injuries.  When this happens, the oneness is for you to hire an attorney and assert your rights under the law.

The first step to establishing a viable personal injury claim is generally proving that a duty existed.  Did the person that injured you owe you a duty of care?  For example, all drivers owe others on the road a duty of care to drive carefully, watch the road, use turn signals when necessary, and drive at reasonably safe spends.  If this duty is breached, then the next question is whether that breach was the proximate cause of your injuries.  Even if a careless motorist breaches their duty to drive safe, it is possible that their carelessness was not the cause of your injury.

In addition to this, Florida is a comparative negligence state.  This means that if you were careless, the amount of money you can recover is reduced by your level of responsibility.  If your case does not go to trial, your degree of fault is determined through negotiation with the insurance company, the opposing party, and the lawyers involved.  If your case does go to trial, your degree of fault is determined by a judge or jury.

Another element of your personal injury claim is time.  In Florida, and a number of other states, you have a limited number of years to file your claim.  Sometimes, the number of years to file is based on the severity of the claim.  For example, in some jurisdictions, there is no statute of limitations for sex abuse victims because of the severity of the conduct, and how difficult it can sometimes be for victims to come forward or recognize that they were abused.  For standard personal injury matters, the time limits can be as low as two years, or as long as four years depending on the matter.  Do not hesitate to contact an attorney if you believe you have been injured by someone else’s carelessness.

Finally, some civil matters are governed entirely by statute.  The term common law refers to a body of law that is enshrined in judicial opinions.  To understand these laws, attorneys rely on the law as it is articulated formed by courts.  The legislature though, will from time to time, recognize an area of law that needs to be codified and pass a statute.  These statutes attempt to precisely describe the prohibited behavior, the procedures for filing a claim, and the damages one can pursue.

Once you have won your claim, you are entitled to recovery for your medical bills, pain and suffering, and sometimes punitive damages.  The competent attorneys at Bryan W. Crews will evaluate your claim for free, and help guide you through the process.  Each case is different, and results are not guaranteed.

Jacksonville Mother Finds Epidural Needle in Her Spine 14 Years After Giving Birth

Posted on: March 29th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

You may have read in the news recently about a mother from Jacksonville, Florida that recently discovered doctors left an epidural needle in her spine, fourteen years ago.  Amy Bright, 41 years old, has endured many years of severe back pain.  The source of that pain was discovered when she recently underwent a “CT scan in 2017 which revealed that three centimeters of the needle was embedded into her spine,” according to Independent.  After the scan, her doctors told her “that because of the needle’s location, it will be too risky to remove, leaving Bright with no choice other than to live with it inside of her and treat the pain with medication.”  The article goes on to say that because of the way the epidural was administered, and the size of the needle, the medical professionals must have known the needle was left inside of the Jacksonville mother.  The mother said, “It has gotten to the point where it just burns constantly.”  The Miami Herald reported the mother as saying that the pain “also shoots down the left side of my leg on my calf… and then down and into my foot.”  According to her attorney, “It’s documented in her medical records that they had an unsuccessful spinal needle attempt at Naval Hospital Jacksonville in September of 2003.”

This unbelievable account is more common than you may realize.  Medical malpractice has become a leading cause of death in this country.  CNBC reports that it is now the third leading cause of death claiming the lives of between 250,000 and 440,000 every year.  We rely on the medical community for treatment and quality of life.  Unfortunately, experiences like those of Amy Bright have led many to question medical practices.

Medical malpractice litigation is complex.  Understanding the law, and science behind medical procedures is critical to the success of your claim.  Dealing with insurance companies, deposing medical professionals, pouring through medical documents, and calculating the full extent of damages are just a few of the components that go into a thorough claim of medical malpractice.  Unavoidable mistakes sometimes happen, but more often than not patients are injured or killed by careless mistakes.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a medical professional, contact Bryan W. Crews today.  The dedicated attorneys at Bryan W. Crews will evaluate your claim for free.  Statistics published by the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences found that roughly 98,000 patients die per year in hospitals due to medical errors.  Do not hesitate to contact an attorney, and do not be intimidated by insurance companies.

Florida Boating Accidents

Posted on: March 27th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Perhaps no state in the union has more recreational boating than Florida.  Recreational boating also makes up a very large percentage of Florida’s overall tourism industry.  With its year-round beautiful weather and extensive coastal access, residents and tourists alike enjoy boating all throughout Florida.  As you can imagine, this unfortunately also leads to boating accidents, in part due to the extensive waterway traffic.  If you or a loved one has been injured in a boating accident then Bryan W. Crews and his staff can help.  There are laws that address maritime accidents, and it is paramount that you engage the services of a legal professional to help you navigate the complexities of personal injury law.

According to the Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission, there were 421 boating injuries and 67 fatalities in 2016.  In total, there were 714 boating accidents in 2016, according to the same commission.  The summer months account for the bulk of these incidents.  As you can see, safety is extremely important, and you should exercise extreme caution when on the waterways.

There is no age requirement in Florida to operate a boat.  Operators over the age of 30 are not even required to have a boating license, and they do not have to undergo safety classes.  This means that a large percentage of operators may not have any training, and some may not even have a license.  This lack of regulation, coupled with the busy waterways, can result in injury or even fatalities.  Also, because public waterways fall under federal jurisdiction, your claim may be filed in federal court.  This adds to the complexity of your personal injury claim.  The attorneys at Bryan W. Crews have decades of experience and will help guide you through the process.

Collisions with other boating vessels are the leading cause of boating accidents in Florida.  Alcohol use, being towed behind the vessel, and being thrown overboard are also examples of common boating accidents.  Other examples include flooding, grounding, fire, explosion, capsizing, striking underwater objects, sinking, and wake damage.  These accidents can occur anywhere.  One of the reasons Florida has such an abundance of recreational boating is its access to waterways.  Bays and sounds, ocean, gulf, rivers, creeks, canals, inlets, lakes, ponds, marshes, and swamps are all examples of the plethora of waterways in Florida.

Your potential recovery could include medical bills, lost wages, future wages, pain and suffering, prescriptions, property damage, or potential loss of companionship.   No two cases are the same, and an evaluation of your claim by a competent personal injury attorney will start the process of understanding the scope of your damages.  If you have not contacted an attorney yet, begin to carefully document everything you can from the date of the accident to the present.  Depending on the parties involved, you may have a claim against one or more insurance carriers.  Call 1-800-683-5291 to speak with an attorney today.

Statute of Limitations

Posted on: March 25th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Kissimmee Personal Injury Attorneys

March 31, 2018

If you have been injured and do not know what do next, contact a legal professional as soon as possible.  Waiting can be costly.  The law places timeframes on your right to bring a lawsuit.  These timeframes are called statutes of limitation.  Time-barred complaints will not be heard by Kissimmee courts.  The rationale for this is simple.  For certain claims, the legislature has decided that potential defendants should not have a possible lawsuit clouding their legal future forever.  Another rationale is that as time goes by, memories fade, evidence disappears, and there is less opportunity for investigators to take statements, gather surveillance footage, or take photographs.  The Kissimmee personal injury attorneys at Bryan W. Crews will evaluate your claim for free.

If you do not file suit within the statutory timeframe, you forfeit your claim.  Kissimmee plaintiffs must abide by Florida’s § 95.11, which covers the statutes of limitation in personal injury cases.  Each case is different, and your unique circumstances will dictate how long you have to bring a lawsuit. Some injuries may require that you bring a claim in as little as two years before being barred from recovery.

If you are suing for negligence you must commence your lawsuit within four years from the date of the injury.  Negligence is a legal term for carelessness or an unreasonable course of conduct that results in injury to another.  This is a general claim, and more specific claims will be governed by different statutes of limitation.

If you are filing an “action for professional malpractice,” according to the statute, you have two years.  Unlike the general negligence deadline, personal injury claims against Kissimmee professionals may be brought “from the time the cause of action is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.”  In other words, some injuries do not manifest themselves right away, and when they do, plaintiffs may not know the cause of their injury either.  Florida law also allows for what is called tolling.  Tolling puts a pause on the clock.  It would be unfair to start the two-year time window for Kissimmee plaintiffs from the date of the accident if you do not know you are injured or do not know the source of your injury.

Statutes of limitation are even more important in medical malpractice lawsuits.  Florida law requires medical malpractices claims in Kissimmee to be filed within two years from the date of the incident, or two years from when the injury is discovered.  Again, tolling is an option here.  This is important, as a common medical malpractice claim stems from surgeons leaving medical instruments, such as sponges or scalpels inside of patients, which then results in infection.  However, the statute also states “in no event shall the action be commenced later than 4 years from the date of the incident.”

Bryan W. Crews is a Kissimmee personal injury attorney and his dedicated staff is standing by to assist the needs of personal injury victims throughout the state of Florida.  Do not hesitate to contact Bryan W. Crews for a free evaluation of your circumstances.

Texting While Driving

Posted on: March 23rd, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

At one point or another, we have all glanced at our phone, composed a text message, stared too long at the GPS, or, in more severe cases, used a cell phone for an extensive period of time to watch a video or read an article while driving.  One study cited in this article found that “92 percent of us drive and text in the last 30 days.”  Even though the public is well aware of the danger, cell phone use while driving has become increasingly common, and it’s dangerous.  Cautious drivers put their phone away or use hands-free devices.  Careless drivers not only put themselves in danger but all drivers around them.  Last year, according to a Tampa Bay Times article, a family with young children was rear-ended at a high rate of speed by a motorist that was looking at their phone and failed to break in time.  The story is heartbreaking, and the accident resulted in the loss of their nine-year-old son.

This month, the Miami Herald reported, the Florida House voted to make texting while driving a primary offense.  The vote was 112-2.  The law is currently only a secondary offense, and this upgrade, as many are calling it, will allow law enforcement to more effectively curtail mindless driving, despite concerns of racial profiling.  Currently, law enforcement can only write a ticket for texting while driving if they pull over a motorist for a primary offense.  The bill’s sponsor said law enforcement will no longer have to “wait for that 16-year-old driver to hit somebody, or run a red light, or kill somebody.”  The law does not prohibit making phone calls while driving.

The upgraded law could have a greater impact on personal injury cases.  Negligence per se is a claim that injured motorists can allege when the person responsible for the accident has broken a law or committed a traffic violation.  For example, exceeding the speed limit is legally significant if the motorist responsible for the accident is brought to trial.  The same is true of this upgraded law.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving claimed the lives of 3,477 people in 2015.  Just a few years ago, a bus driver in Tennessee was texting while driving and collided with another school bus.  The accident left two young girls and an aspiring teacher dead.  According to the Huffington Post, nine Americans die every day from distracted drivers, 341,000 motor vehicle crashes in 2013 involved texting and driving, and cell phone use while driving increase the likelihood of an accident four-fold.

Realizing the dangers of texting and driving, the Florida legislature has taken a step in the right direction.  Do not text and drive.  Doing so not only puts you and your family at risk, but it also puts the lives of those around you on the road at risk too.  Secondary to that concern is the fact that texting and driving could limit your own personal recovery if a jury hears that you yourself were distracted while driving.

If you or a loved one have been injured in a car accident, please contact Bryan W. Crews today, your Orlando personal injury attorney for a free consultation.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Posted on: March 21st, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Winter Garden Attorneys

Intentional infliction of emotional distress is a type of harm that occurs when someone is injured by extreme and outrageous conduct.  It is a very difficult claim to prove, and it is many times frivolously alleged.  To succeed in a claim for intentional infliction of emotional in Winter Park, one must prove that the extreme and outrageous conduct caused severe emotional distress.  It must also show that the defendant’s conduct intended to cause, knew with substantial certainty it would cause, or it was highly probable to cause, and does cause severe emotional distress.  Extreme and outrageous behavior is something that is determined by the court, it is a question of law, not fact.  This claim also usually requires frequent or repetitious behavior.  Rarely will a single instance be enough to succeed.  Another common factor to successful claims is a power differential, the defendant is often a supervisor or someone in a position of authority of influence.

The Columbia Journalism Review recently reported on an interesting intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit.  You might recall the unfortunate death of a Democratic National Committee staffer named Seth Rich.  His homicide is still under investigation.  Recently, his parents filed a lawsuit against Fox News for pushing a false narrative that Rich was murdered because he was the source of a leak of emails to WikiLeaks.  In their complaint, they allege intentional infliction of emotional distress against the news network.  The complaint alleges that Fox News pushed a “sham story,” that they have since retracted.  According to the complaint, as explained in the article, the news network “laundered that theory through a wholly deficient story published on May 16, 2017, on Fox News’s website.”  The article goes on to say “the lawsuit is not a sure winner for the parents; it evokes emotional distress, historically a hard claim to win against the media.”  The parents allege that they have not been able to “com[e] to terms with his murder because they were repeatedly forced to relive it”; “symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder … and [of] obsessive-compulsive behavior”; “feelings of anxiety…triggered by…stories in the media and by their feeling that they never know what is going to come next”; and, for Mary, “symptoms consistent with Social Anxiety Disorder.”  There are a variety of First Amendment issues that will inevitably surface in this suit.  But it demonstrates the type of claim that is often brought in a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Some jurisdictions follow a theory called the impact rule.  This rule requires the Winter Park plaintiff to prove that she has suffered a physical injury.  In other words, the severe emotional distress must manifest itself as a physical symptom.  Psychological trauma alone is not enough.  The reason for this rule is somewhat obvious.  It allows courts to more efficiently determine whether there has been an actual harm because intentional infliction of emotional distress can be such an amorphous claim.

If you or a loved one have been injured, contact the Winter Park personal injury attorneys at Bryan W. Crews.  Their expertise and decades of experience will be put to work for you.  Call today for a free evaluation of your claim.

Things You Need To Know About Medical Malpractice Cases

Posted on: March 18th, 2018 by ContentDev No Comments

Medical malpractice cases are generally sought by patients who have been harmed due to poor medical treatment from a medical practitioner. It is one of the most complex kinds of personal injury law. Believe it or not, medical negligence is the third leading cause of death in the United States!

Some Important Facts:

Legal Definition

Medical malpractice is any act committed by a physician or other healthcare provider during treatment which causes injury or damages.

How do you determine if someone is the victim of medical negligence?

There are several ways to tell whether you or someone you know may have been a victim of medical malpractice.

What should you do if you suspect that you’ve been subjected to negligent care?
If you believe that you or someone you know has been injured because of a medical error, contacting a seasoned malpractice attorney should be the first step. Always consult a best personal injury attorney with a vast amount of experience with medical malpractice cases, as they will likely have a higher rate of success. It is possible to know whether you have a case only after the medical records have been reviewed and experts have been consulted.
After a thorough review, your attorney will be able to determine whether or not your case is actionable.

Who decides if a practitioner committed malpractice?
Eventually, a jury or a judge decides whether a doctor committed malpractice. The judge or jury will hear testimony from the victim (if capable of testifying), the defendant, various witnesses who know something about the case, and expert witnesses.

How Long You Have to File a Claim
It is important to find out how much time you have to legally bring the claim while deciding whether to file a medical malpractice claim. A statute of limitations is the deadline or time limit for which you must file a lawsuit for all civil claims. To ensure the time period for filing a claim doesn’t run out, always check the state laws in your particular state.

Comparative Negligence and Assessing Fault

Posted on: March 17th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Lake Buena Vista Personal Injury Attorneys

Accidents and personal injuries are complex matters, and sometimes more than one person is at fault.  In a typical scenario, a careless driver causes an accident and the injured motorist recovers 100% of the cost of their injury against the careless driver.  In Florida, however, comparative negligence could change the outcome.  While typical, just as often the injured motorist is somewhat responsible for their injury.  Perhaps the injured motorist was on their cellphone and had they been paying attention, could have reduced the rate of impact, or turned at the last minute, even though the careless driver was the primary cause of the accident.  In either event, in Florida, the injured motorist will have their recovery reduced to the degree they are deemed to have contributed to their own injury.  If a court determines that they were 30% responsible, they will only recover 70% of their injury from the careless driver. Florida’s comparative negligence rule is codified under section 768.81 and is an important consideration when evaluating the facts of your case.

Comparative negligence can be applied in a variety of legal matters.  Erin Andrews is a sportscaster and television personality who came to prominence on College Gameday.  In 2016, a “jury has awarded Erin Andrews $55 million in her lawsuit stemming from nude videos secretly taken by Michael Barrett, an insurance executive from suburban Chicago” according to Property Casualty 360.  Barrett was caught “secretly recording Andrews through peepholes bored in hotel walls after he made arrangements to occupy rooms next to Andrews.”  After Barrett was criminally sentenced, Erin Andrews eventually filed suit against the hotel company, the hotel operators, and Barrett himself.  The hotel company, the Marriott, was dismissed.  The operators were not dismissed from the suit.  After a trial, the “jury apportioned liability with 51% assessed against the perpetrator, Michael Barrett, and 49% against the two companies, West End Hotel Partners, and Windsor Capital Group, which owned and operated the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt University, where the secret videos were taken in 2008.”

The Erin Andrews case demonstrates that even though the perpetrator, Barrett, was the primary cause of the intrusion into Andrews’ privacy, the hotel operators contributed to the injury.  The hotel employees, agents of the hotel operators, revealed Andrews’ private information, allowing Barrett to commit these heinous acts.  Without their involvement, Barrett very likely would not have discovered Andrews’ location within the hotel.  While the facts of this case are not typical, they do demonstrate that apportioning fault, and comparative negligence can limit your recovery against anyone tortfeasor.

The Lake Buena Vista personal injury attorneys at Bryan W. Crews and Associates will evaluate your claim for free. Contact them today for a consultation.  If your claim has merit, you may be entitled to recovery and the Lake Buena Vista attorneys will advocate on your behalf to protect your interests.

Trespass to Land and Nuisance:

Posted on: March 15th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

Winter Park Property Rights

As a possessor of land, you have the right to exclude others from your property.  Whether you own, rent, or lease your property, your right to use includes the right to unfettered interference.  There are two common claims you can bring against those that trespass or interfere with your use of a property.  Think of trespass as a physical invasion or intrusion of your property.  Nuisance, however, is an interference, or an impediment to the enjoyment of your property.

Trespass to land occurs when someone enters your property without permission or remains on your property, or places or projects any object on your property.  You must prove actual entry and this does not require that the entry be intentional.  Depending on the circumstances and the law, even inadvertent trespass can be actionable.  It must the land of another and the claim must be brought by someone who has a legal interest in the property.  The trespass must be without consent.  Police officers, postal workers, and others have what is called implied consent to enter your property according to custom.  Depending on the jurisdiction, you may or may not have to prove damages.  Some jurisdictions only require annoyance or discomfort to support a claim for trespass.  Common damages include loss of market value, the cost to restore the property, loss of use, or damage to property.  You may be able to seek an injunction also.  Note that once you know the trespasser is present, you may have certain obligations to warn the trespasser of unsafe conditions on the property.  If someone has trespassed on your land, contact the Winter Park attorneys at Bryan W. Crews today for an evaluation of your claim.

A nuisance occurs when there is a substantial and unreasonable interference with another’s use and enjoyment of their property.  Generally, this nuisance or interference can be intentional, negligent, or actionable as a strict liability claim.  Nuisance law is different than trespass.  This interference usually occurs when someone else’s behavior or use of their property affects the use of your property.  For example, light pollution, noise pollution, noxious odors or smokes can all constitute unreasonable interferences with the use and enjoyment of your property.  If you live next door to someone that is constantly burning trash, the smoke and odor could be said to be a nuisance.  Those affected can file an injunction to enjoin the defendant’s activity.  You may also have damages on which you can collect compensation.  A public nuisance is an interference with a right common to the public and is usually brought by the government on behalf of the citizenry.

Each case is different, and results are not guaranteed.  In addition to these issues, your homeowner’s association, or condominium board may have rules and procedures to deal with the nuisance.  Or, they may fail to act.  Regardless of your situation, the Winter Park personal injury attorneys at Bryan W. Crews will evaluate your claim for free, and zealously advocate on your behalf.  You may seek an injunction to stop the trespass or nuisance, and possibly be entitled to reasonable compensation for any loss that you have suffered.

Motorcycle Safety

Posted on: March 11th, 2018 by pmilakovic No Comments

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, there were 4,957 motorcycle fatalities and 93,000 motorcycle injuries in 2012.  Riding is a great recreational activity and an exhilarating way to see the beautiful landscapes that Florida has to offer.  But riding can be dangerous, and motorcyclists face unique dangers.  Not all motorists pay attention to motorcyclists, and riders are taught unique defense driving skills.  In addition, motorcyclists are exposed, and without the proper precautions are prone to severe injury.  Most vehicles act as a protective cage during a collision, whereas riders are often thrown from their motorcycle.

Safety is paramount and riders should take precautions.  Wearing a helmet could make the difference in an accident.  According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Highway Loss Data Institute, “helmets are about 37 percent effective in preventing motorcycle deaths and about 67 percent effective in preventing brain injuries.”  In 2005, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that “the potential lifesaving benefits of helmets are not being realized, as fatalities continue to rise in response to declining helmet usage rates.”  In 2017, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention wrote that “if all motorcyclists would have worn helmets in 2015, 740 more could have been saved.”

The statistics confirm what most would consider common sense.  Reasonable protective measures can make the difference in the event of a crash.  Abrasion-resistant pants can prevent or reduce further injury to your skin, especially in the event of a high-speed crash or collision.  You should also consider wearing protective eye gear, long sleeve jacket, boots, and gloves.  Do not exchange safety for convenience or comfort while riding.  Proper safety gear will not prevent an accident, and it may not prevent an injury.  But wearing safety gear could significantly reduce or prevent injuries.

If you have been injured, contact Bryan W. Crews today, your Pine Hills personal injury attorney.  In addition to the trauma of an accident, dealing with insurance companies or the party responsible for the accident can be taxing.  The Pine Hills professionals at Bryan W. Crews will evaluate your personal injury claim for free and zealously advocate on your behalf.  Supporting your claim may require the collection of police reports, witness statements, photographs, video, accident reconstruction, expert witnesses, and the review of medical records.  In addition, motorcyclists are not covered by Personal Injury Insurance Protection.  This could complicate matters further.  Do not hesitate to contact our offices for a review of your case.  Each case is different, and results are not guaranteed.

© 2017 Bryan Crews & Associates
info@crewsandpesquera.com
(800) 683-5291
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.